ArticleGlobal change biology2026
Divergent Temporal Trends in Carbon Assimilation-Growth Coupling Across Global Forests.
Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how trees allocate assimilated carbon to growth is essential for projecting forest carbon sequestration. However, the temporal dynamics of the relative roles of carbon assimilation (source) versus cambial activity (sink) in regulating tree growth remain poorly understood. Using multiple gross and net primary productivity (GPP and NPP) data and tree-ring width records from 2126 sites worldwide, we quantified the temporal trend of the correlation between carbon assimilation and tree growth (R trend) over the past three decades. We found that the R trend varied substantially across sites, with 57.8% of the sites exhibiting negative trends and 42.2% showing positive trends, reflecting a temporal increase in decoupling between carbon assimilation and tree growth in many forests, but a strengthening of coupling in others. Precipitation strongly affected the spatial variation in the R trend, with its importance only slightly lower than that of temperature. Sites with lower baseline precipitation tended to exhibit more positive R trends, whereas those with higher baseline precipitation more often exhibited negative R trends, with these patterns potentially modulated by soil properties and plant traits. These empirical negative effects of precipitation on the R trend were further reproduced by 13 current Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs). In addition, model outputs under different future climate scenarios indicated that the coupling between carbon assimilation and tree growth is likely to strengthen across broader regions by the end of the 21st century due to the ongoing climate change. Overall, our findings reveal the importance of incorporating precipitation influences for improving the understanding of the temporal dynamics of the coupling between carbon assimilation and tree growth under future climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.