Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740481›Full record

ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2026

Structural and functional characterisation of a reconstructed ancestral strigolactone receptor.

Andrew J Tuckey, Andrew C Marshall, Emel Rothzerg, Antonella P Monte, Tom Bennett, Charles S Bond, Mark T Waters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Negative feedback regulation of karrikin signaling inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew J TuckeySchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3781-0608
Andrew C MarshallSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9770-4594
Emel RothzergSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1957-930X
Antonella P MonteSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Tom BennettSchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1612-4019
Charles S BondSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9584-6783
Mark T WatersSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5657-9005

Funding

Australian Research Council DE240101210Australian Research Council DP240102441Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R00398X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strigolactones are phytohormones that regulate shoot branching and facilitate communication with neighbouring plants, bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. In seed plants, strigolactone perception begins with the enzyme-receptor DWARF14 (D14), an α/β-hydrolase likely to have evolved via gene duplication within a larger gene family that includes the karrikin receptor, KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE 2 (KAI2) and other D14-like (DLK) proteins of uncertain function. However, it is unclear when the functional characteristics that define a bona fide strigolactone receptor evolved. Here, we apply ancestral sequence reconstruction to generate a D14 protein representative of seed plants to study the evolution of ligand specificity and the conservation of signalling mechanisms and to explore desirable traits for protein engineering. Ancestrally reconstructed D14 is structurally and functionally comparable to D14 from Arabidopsis thaliana. The ligand specificity of ancestral D14 does not meaningfully differ, despite having unusual active site geometry and altered enzyme kinetics. We show that the catalytic aspartic acid residue of ancestral D14 is not required for strigolactone signalling when expressed in A. thaliana, suggesting that this mechanistic feature is conserved throughout seed plants. We find that ancestral D14 exhibits higher recombinant yields, greatly increased thermostability and enhanced catalytic activity relative to D14 from A. thaliana. This work provides insight into the evolution of phytohormone signalling and presents a robust scaffold for the application of D14-type proteins in diverse applications.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingLactonesPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceAmino Acid SequenceEvolution, MolecularHydrolasesSignal TransductionArabidopsis ProteinsDWARF14 protein, ArabidopsisGR24 strigolactoneHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHydrolasesLactonesPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsReceptors, Cell Surfaceancestral sequence reconstructionArabidopsis thalianabutenolidehormone signallingstrigolactone

Identifiers

PMID42740481
PMCPMC13575467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.