Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740408›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2026

Self-Care Behaviors in Osteoporosis: A Cross-Cultural Study Using Multidimensional Analysis of Textual Data.

Chiara Tedesco, Vicente Bernalte-Martí, Adela Melgarejo Uréndez, Arantxa Conesa, María Desamparados Bernat-Adell, Mara Tormen, Gianluca Pucciarelli, Ercole Vellone, Maddalena De Maria, Emanuela Basilici Zannetti and 5 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Chiara TedescoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4296-9680
Vicente Bernalte-MartíDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6419-2238
Adela Melgarejo UréndezDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Arantxa ConesaRheumatology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
María Desamparados Bernat-AdellDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6616-6925
Mara TormenDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4988-9114
Gianluca PucciarelliDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.
Ercole VelloneDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4673-7473
Maddalena De MariaDepartment of Life Health Sciences and Health Professions, Link Campus University, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0507-0158
Emanuela Basilici ZannettiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5330-9808
Noemi CittadiniDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.
Annalisa PenniniDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.
Umberto TarantinoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Policlinico Tor Vergata Foundation, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.
Rosaria AlvaroDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4659-1569
Mariachiara FiguraDepartment of Maternal and Child Health Promotion, Internal Medicine & Specialties of Excellence "G. D'Alessandro" (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8204-0564

Funding

Universitat Jaume I UJI-2024-20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOsteoporosis is a chronic skeletal condition that significantly affects daily life and may benefit from adequate self-care. The Middle-Range Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness conceptualizes self-care as a naturalistic process encompassing maintenance, monitoring, and management, also shaped by contextual and cultural factors. Despite this theoretical framework, limited evidence exists on how people with osteoporosis conceptualize and enact self-care in different cultural contexts. Italy and Spain provide comparable yet distinct settings for exploring cultural influences on self-care practices. This study aims to explore and compare self-care behaviors among Italian and Spanish people with osteoporosis.

designA cross-national qualitative study was conducted using an Automatic Analysis of Textual Data approach within the Exploratory Multidimensional Data Analysis framework.

methodsForty people with osteoporosis (38 women and 2 men; mean age 68.6 years, SD = 5.74) were recruited, equally distributed between Italy (n = 20) and Spain (n = 20). Data were analyzed using Labbé's intertextual distance and correspondence analysis to examine lexical similarities, differences, and semantic structures of self-care narratives.

resultsAlthough moderate intra-national lexical similarity was observed within each national group, substantial inter-national differences emerged between Italian and Spanish participants in the discursive construction of self-care. Italian participants described self-care as a medically mediated and system-oriented process, closely linked to professional guidance, diagnostic procedures, and prescribed treatments. In contrast, Spanish participants framed self-care as embodied, routine-based, and emotionally expressive, grounded in daily practices and bodily awareness. These findings indicate that participants relied on distinct cultural and epistemic models when interpreting and organizing self-care experiences.

conclusionThis study highlights clear cross-cultural differences in how people with osteoporosis narrate and conceptualize self-care. Methodologically, it illustrates the potential of multidimensional analysis to support systematic and transparent comparison of qualitative datasets. The findings are consistent with the Middle-Range Theory of Self-Care and suggest that greater attention to cultural contexts may inform the development of self-care interventions that are more responsive to individuals' lived experiences. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Recognizing how cultural contexts influence how people with osteoporosis understand and practise self-care may help nurses tailor communication and educational support to individuals' everyday experiences, supporting more responsive and culturally sensitive care.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonOsteoporosisSelf CareAgedFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSpaincross‐culturalmultidimensional analysisosteoporosisqualitativeself‐care

Identifiers

PMID42740408
PMCPMC13575457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.