Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740375›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2026

Reconstructing the major skull myology of the giant stem-amphibian Mastodonsaurus: A case study for early tetrapods.

Daniel Schwarz, Stephan Lautenschlager, Florian Witzmann, Raphael Moreno, Eudald Mujal, Rainer R Schoch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel SchwarzDepartment of Palaeontology, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart (SMNS), Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5845-4027
Stephan LautenschlagerSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3472-814X
Florian WitzmannMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany.
Raphael MorenoDepartment of Palaeontology, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart (SMNS), Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6016-8499
Eudald MujalDepartment of Palaeontology, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart (SMNS), Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6310-323X
Rainer R SchochDepartment of Palaeontology, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart (SMNS), Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0312-2877

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 468618938Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 508778113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Devonian fish-to-tetrapod transition and the subsequent conquest of land involved multiple amphibious stem and early tetrapod lineages, yet how these animals reduced their dependence on aquatic environments remains uncertain. Feeding is central to this transition, as early tetrapods likely moved from predominantly aquatic suction feeding to jaw-based prey prehension and processing. Although recent functional approaches-including morphometrics, functional morphology and computational modelling-offer new perspectives, their interpretive strength depends on realistic soft-tissue inputs, particularly cranial musculature. Here, we reconstruct the principal cranio-mandibular (skull) musculature of the Middle Triassic capitosaur temnospondyl Mastodonsaurus giganteus to provide an explicit anatomical foundation for future functional and modelling studies of stem and early tetrapods and to refine ecological interpretations for this species. We formulate alternative muscle hypotheses within an extant phylogenetic bracket (EPB) framework that explicitly reflects uncertainty in temnospondyl placement (temnospondyl versus lepospondyl origin of lissamphibians). We developed hypotheses from a literature review and digital dissections of contrast-enhanced soft-tissue μCT datasets from selected extant bracket taxa and outgroups and assessed them against osteological correlates in M. giganteus. Our reconstruction indicates a more differentiated adductor system than commonly assumed, with subdivision of the adductor mandibulae externus and internus complexes and an inferred intramandibular component consistent with a cartilaginous sesamoid ('cartilago transiliens') functioning as a force-transmitting pulley. We further provide osteological evidence for previously unrecognised pterygoideus components, suggesting additional jaw-closing capacity and a potential contribution to rapid gape formation. The 'tongue' in M. giganteus was likely comparatively weak and less flexibly movable, while as a stereospondyl, it possessed a comparatively strong neck and specialised anterior ribs. Collectively, these traits are consistent with a mainly crocodile-like bite-and-hold prehension ecology and likely indicate kinetic-inertial feeding. Our muscle reconstruction further suggests a more balanced jaw-opening/closing system that may have enabled compensatory suction during gape formation.

Indexed as

early tetrapodsevolutionary morphologyextant phylogenetic bracketfunctional anatomysoft‐tissue reconstructiontemnospondyls

Identifiers

PMID42740375
PMCPMC13575354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.