Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740370›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Event-Driven Type Design for Clinical Trials With Recurrent Events.

Jingwen Zhang, Satoshi Hattori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jingwen ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2327-8278
Satoshi HattoriDepartment of Biomedical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0200-1408

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI 25K03086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is common practice in randomized clinical trials with the standard survival outcome to follow patients until a prespecified number of events have been observed, a type of trial known as the event-driven trial. The event-driven design ensures that the target power for a specified Type I error rate is achieved to detect the target hazard ratio, regardless of the specification of other quantities. To understand the treatment effect for chronic conditions, the analysis of recurrent events has gained popularity in randomized controlled trials, particularly large-scale confirmatory trials. In the absence of within-subject correlation among multiple events, a similar event-driven design can be employed for recurrent event outcomes. On the other hand, in the presence of within-subject correlation, one needs to model the correlation among recurrent events in evaluating power and setting the sample size. However, information useful in modeling the within-subject correlation is limited at the design stage. Failing to properly account for correlation may lead to underpowered studies. We propose an event-driven type design for recurrent event outcomes. Our method ensures the target power for the target treatment effect, regardless of the specification of other quantities, by monitoring the robust variance under the marginal rates/means model in a blinded manner. We investigate the operating characteristics of the proposed monitoring procedure in simulation studies. The results of simulation studies showed that the proposed blinded monitoring procedure controlled the power well so that the test possessed the target power and did not lead to serious inflation of the Type I error rate. Furthermore, we illustrate the proposed method using a real clinical trial dataset.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalProportional Hazards ModelsRecurrenceSample SizeAndersen–Gill modelblinded continuous monitoringfrailty modelproportional rate modelsandwich variance

Identifiers

PMID42740370
PMCPMC13575311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.