Observational studyInternational wound journal2026
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Diabetic Lower-Limb Wounds in the Caribbean: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Observational study in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an established adjunctive treatment for selected diabetic foot ulcers, although evidence regarding its effectiveness remains heterogeneous. We conducted a retrospective, single-center, observational study of adult diabetic patients receiving HBOT (2.5 ATA, 100% oxygen) for a lower-limb wound at the only hyperbaric center in Guadeloupe, a French Caribbean territory, between January 2020 and June 2023. Among 257 patients treated with HBOT, 71 diabetic patients met inclusion criteria (mean age 63.1 ± 12.7 years; 69% male). Peripheral arterial disease and osteitis were highly prevalent, while the proportion of current smokers (7.9%) was notably lower than in previously published HBOT cohorts, a distinctive feature of this population. HBOT was considered a last resort, after failure of prolonged conventional therapy, in 63% of patients, likely contributing to the modest six-month healing rate of 34% (18/53 evaluable patients) and 19% rate of major amputation occurring during or after HBOT. Patients referred through the multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Care Unit had fewer major amputations despite older age and greater vascular burden, though this comparison may reflect referral-related selection bias. No candidate factor, including glycemic control, referral pathway, or delay to HBOT, reached statistical significance in univariable analysis. This descriptive, single-arm finding cannot establish HBOT efficacy but is consistent with a role for HBOT within coordinated multidisciplinary diabetic foot care, highlighting the importance of earlier referral and optimised patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.