ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Neurophysiological Characterization of ADHD in Children Using EEG Signals: A Machine Learning Approach to Executive Function Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder whose clinical assessment relies mainly on behavioral and neuropsychological evaluation. This study evaluates a subject-wise machine learning framework for distinguishing children with ADHD from healthy controls using multichannel EEG-derived features. The public dataset comprised 121 participants (61 ADHD and 60 controls), with 19-channel EEG recordings sampled at 128 Hz. Signals were segmented into 4-s windows with 50% overlap, and statistical and spectral features were extracted, including mean, standard deviation, and theta-, alpha-, and beta-band power. Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Logistic Regression (LR) were evaluated using strict subject-wise separation. RF achieved the highest Accuracy (0.8099), F1-score (0.8160), Balanced Accuracy (0.8097), and MCC (0.6204), whereas SVM obtained the highest Sensitivity (0.8525) and ROC-AUC (0.8527). An additional subject-specific analysis based on individual alpha frequency (IAF) was performed to account for inter-individual spectral variability; mean IAF values were 8.8320 Hz for ADHD and 8.8833 Hz for controls, and the individualized-band analysis did not improve classification performance. Bootstrap confidence intervals and non-parametric tests indicated comparable performance among RF, SVM, and GB. Frontal and fronto-central channels, particularly Fz, showed the greatest model-derived contribution. Overall, the framework provides a reproducible subject-wise EEG classification approach, although external validation on independent cohorts remains necessary before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.