ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multi-Source Perception, Intelligent Decision-Making, and Precision Control for Autonomous Agricultural Systems: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid advancement of autonomous agricultural systems (AASs) is transforming modern agriculture, where labor shortages, sustainability imperatives, and demands for precision farming are driving the adoption of intelligent agricultural platforms. Agricultural production environments present uniquely challenging conditions for autonomous agricultural systems, including unstructured and dynamically changing terrain, biologically variable targets, unpredictable illumination and weather conditions, and safe human-machine coexistence. This review systematically investigates three cornerstone technologies: multi-source perception, intelligent decision-making, and precision control. Furthermore, typical agricultural operations, including soil tillage, planting, irrigation and drainage, fertilization, plant protection, harvesting, and agricultural product processing, are reviewed to illustrate their applications. Based on representative operational scenarios, the research progress and application characteristics of intelligent equipment in environmental perception, operational optimization, and control execution are summarized. Specifically, multi-source perception is evolving from isolated sensor-based acquisition toward multimodal and deep learning-enabled semantic scene understanding. Intelligent decision-making has evolved from experience-driven approaches toward physics-informed, data-driven, and knowledge-enhanced frameworks for adaptive operational optimization. Precision control has progressed from conventional PID control toward adaptive, learning-based, and digital twin-enabled control strategies, achieving robust high-precision closed-loop regulation. However, several critical challenges persist: limited cross-domain generalization and robustness of perception models under environmental distribution shift, constrained interpretability and trustworthiness of data-driven decision systems, and insufficient adaptability of control architectures under multi-disturbance coupled field conditions. To address these gaps, future research should prioritize multi-source heterogeneous data fusion and standardization, collaborative control frameworks integrating mechanistic knowledge with data-driven learning, and explainable artificial intelligence combined with agricultural domain expertise-advancing toward genuinely autonomous, trustworthy, and resilient agricultural systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.