ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Deployment-Oriented Evaluation of Lightweight IMU-Based Human Activity Recognition: On-Device Efficiency and Streaming Feasibility.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
On-device Human Activity Recognition (HAR) requires balancing accuracy and deployment efficiency on constrained hardware. We present Lightweight Human Activity Recognition (L-HAR), a controlled comparison of Baseline and Lightweight Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN), Transformer, and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models using data sampled at 100Hz from three inertial measurement units (IMUs) worn by one participant. Evaluations covered classification, model footprint, multiply-accumulate operations (MACs), offline CPU latency, Desktop/Raspberry Pi streaming, 8-bit integer (INT8) quantization, and software-estimated Raspberry Pi energy efficiency. Lightweighting reduced parameters by up to 95.5%, model size by 94.0%, and MACs by 87.6-95.5%, with accuracy reductions of 0.8-2.2 percentage points (pp) and sub-millisecond offline latency for all Lightweight models. Baseline and Lightweight models sustained approximately 100Hz message/inference rates on Desktop, whereas no Raspberry Pi configuration reached 100Hz inference. Among Lightweight models, Transformer achieved 9.381ms End-to-End (E2E) latency and 66.925Hz inference. INT8 quantization changed accuracy and F1-score by less than 0.13 pp; Quantized TCN achieved the best Raspberry Pi streaming result (9.066ms E2E; 69.928Hz) with an estimated 49.933mJ per inference. These results demonstrate architecture- and backend-dependent deployment behavior and the need for direct target-platform evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.