ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
GMoE-AD: Generalized Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection via Mixture-of-Experts and Domain-Invariant Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hyperspectral (HS) sensing provides detailed high-dimensional spectral data to identify subtle anomalies and material variations in complex scenes. HS anomaly detection (HS-AD) aims to identify small, spectrally distinct objects or materials in HS imagery without prior target information. However, most HS-AD methods assume that the training and test data are drawn from the same distribution (single-domain). This assumption is often violated in operational sensing because of differences in sensor characteristics, scene composition, atmospheric conditions, and acquisition geometry. To address this challenge, we propose Generalized MoE-AD (GMoE-AD), a neural Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture for robust cross-domain hyperspectral anomaly detection. The framework fuses the outputs of six unsupervised base detectors with representations from a pretrained HS foundation model, combines four neural experts through learned top-2 routing, and applies gradient-reversal-based domain-adversarial training to improve robustness under distribution shifts. A drift-aware test-time adaptation (DTA) variant is evaluated separately. We evaluate GMoE-AD on six public real-world HS benchmark datasets-San-Diego, Salinas, HYDICE-Urban, ABU-Airport, ABU-Beach, and ABU-Urban-and one private Arizona dataset comprising 22 images acquired by four different sensors. Under all-domain training, the model uses the training portions of all seven datasets and is evaluated without access to domain identity or dataset-specific information. GMoE-AD achieves an average ROC-AUC of 0.943, PR-AUC of 0.623, and F1-macro of 0.821 in this setting. In a leave-one-dataset-out (LODO) evaluation, where the target dataset is completely unseen during training, the model maintains an average ROC-AUC of 0.910 and F1-macro of 0.773. The optional DTA variant increases mean ROC-AUC from 0.938 to 0.953 but reduces F1-macro from 0.822 to 0.815, indicating a metric- and dataset-dependent adaptation trade-off. These results suggest that combining neural expert routing, transfer learning, and domain-adversarial representation learning improves robustness across heterogeneous HS datasets and provides a unified approach to anomaly detection in high-dimensional sensor data, supporting deployment in real-world hyperspectral applications where training and deployment conditions differ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.