Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740266›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Benchmarking Zero-Shot Open-Vocabulary and Fine-Tuned Object Detectors for Underground Mine Personnel Detection.

Ellen Essien, Samuel Frimpong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ellen EssienDepartment of Mining and Explosives Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-2648-1916
Samuel FrimpongDepartment of Mining and Explosives Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8300-6824

Funding

ACL HHS U60OH012685Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health U60OH012685-01-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable personnel detection is critical for the safe deployment of autonomous haulage systems in underground mining, where challenging environmental conditions demand robust real-time perception. Existing research has focused primarily on fine-tuned convolutional detectors, while systematic comparisons with zero-shot vision-language models remain limited. This study presents a cross-paradigm benchmark comparing four zero-shot vision-language models (YOLO-World, Grounding DINO, OWL-ViT, and OWLv2) with four fine-tuned YOLO detectors (YOLOv8s, YOLOv9s, YOLO11s, and YOLO26s) using 31,396 real-world underground coal mine images. Detection performance was evaluated using precision, recall, F1-score, average precision, inference speed, and condition- and target scale-specific recall. The experimental results show that the fine-tuned detectors achieved F1-scores of 0.8449-0.8662 and AP50 values of 0.8791-0.9135, with YOLO26s achieving the strongest overall performance. In comparison, the zero-shot models achieved F1-scores of 0.3186-0.5484 and AP50 values of 0.2484-0.5108, with Grounding DINO performing best among the zero-shot models. Fine-tuned detectors also maintained substantially higher recall for occluded personnel and small apparent targets. These findings demonstrate a substantial performance advantage for domain-specific fine-tuning over the evaluated zero-shot approaches and establish a controlled cross-paradigm benchmark for comparing detection paradigms for underground personnel perception.

Indexed as

autonomous haulagemine safety and healthobject detectionpersonnel detectionunderground miningvision-language modelsYOLO

Identifiers

PMID42740266
PMCPMC13568132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.