Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740256›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Vision-Based Automated Inspection of Box Meals for Food Portion Defects and Foreign Object Detection.

Hong-Dar Lin, Guan-Ming Chen, Chou-Hsien Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hong-Dar LinDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan.
Guan-Ming ChenDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan.
Chou-Hsien LinDepartment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-0273, USA.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council MOST 108-2221-E-324-008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated inspection of prepared meals is important for improving food safety, quality assurance, and production efficiency. However, vision-based inspection remains challenging because boxed meals contain multiple adjacent food items with irregular shapes, varying portion sizes, and visually similar appearances, while oily surfaces may introduce specular reflections that degrade image quality. This study presents a vision-based framework for multi-object recognition and quantitative defect analysis in complex meal images, with Chinese-style lunch boxes used as representative test samples. The framework integrates region-of-interest (ROI) extraction, fixed-grid regional feature representation, deep neural network (DNN) classification, flood-filling post-processing, and empirical food-quantity thresholds. The lunch-box ROI is first extracted using the Hough transform, followed by median filtering to suppress reflection noise. The ROI is partitioned into 6 × 6 regions, from which the mean and standard deviation of RGB, HSV, and CIE Lab* color components are extracted and classified using a DNN. Flood filling is subsequently applied to refine the classification results, and category-specific empirical thresholds are used to identify missing food items and insufficient portions. Foreign objects are detected as an additional abnormal category. Under the evaluated experimental conditions, the proposed framework achieved an overall image classification rate (CR) of 96.45%, a defective-image detection rate (1-β) of 97.76%, a normal-image false alarm rate (α) of 5.34%, and a defective-image misclassification rate (γ) of 0.82%. Sensitivity experiments involving illumination variation, two lunch-box configurations with different food compositions, and conveyor-based image acquisition further demonstrated the feasibility and stability of the framework under the evaluated laboratory and prototype conditions. These findings support the feasibility of the proposed lightweight framework for vision-based quality inspection of representative boxed meals, while broader validation across meal types, contaminants, and industrial production environments remains necessary.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsDetection AlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPattern Recognition, Automateddeep neural networkfood portion estimationforeign object detectionlunch-box inspectionmachine visionsuperpixel segmentation

Identifiers

PMID42740256
PMCPMC13568288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.