ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model of Pilgrims' Tiredness During Hajj Using Smartwatch Physiological and Mobility Indicators.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pilgrim safety during Hajj is challenged by dense crowds, sustained physical exertion, and demanding environmental conditions that can increase tiredness and compromise well-being. Although wearable sensing enables objective monitoring, the reviewed literature provides limited evidence on how synthetic augmentation affects predictive performance and cross-participant generalization when wearable data are scarce. To address this gap, this study presents an integrated framework that combines correlation- and domain-informed feature screening with statistically constrained synthetic data generation and a complementary assessment of predictive performance and synthetic data fidelity. Using the Hajj 1445 (June 2024) Apple Watch dataset comprising 120 records from three participants, the study compares classical resampling, univariate normal generation, multivariate normal (MVN) sampling, and covariance-aware generation using Cholesky decomposition and Mahalanobis distance filtering under a consistent classifier evaluation protocol. The highest observed record-level test accuracy is 93.33%, achieved by a Decision Tree using MVN sampling with moderate clipping (±1.4). Leave-one-participant-out evaluation of the same configuration yields a mean accuracy of 68.65% (SD = 19.72%), indicating lower cross-participant generalization. The regularized MVN-Cholesky-Mahalanobis configuration attains a composite synthetic-data quality score of 79.27%. These results show that statistically constrained synthetic augmentation can support tiredness prediction when real data are limited, while the participant-grouped results highlight the need for validation using larger and more diverse Hajj cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.