ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An ECG-PPG Physiological Signal Emulator for Calibration and Validation of Cardiovascular Monitoring Devices.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physiological signal emulators support the calibration, validation, and stress testing of cardiovascular monitoring devices. However, many existing systems generate electrocardiography (ECG) or photoplethysmography (PPG) independently and offer limited control over arrhythmia detection and ECG-PPG coupling. This study presents a programmable physiological signal emulator that integrates a unified event-driven ECG-PPG model with synchronized multichannel hardware. The model represents atrial pacing, atrioventricular conduction, and ventricular activation as separate functional blocks, enabling normal sinus rhythm, first-degree atrioventricular block, second-degree atrioventricular block Mobitz I, complete atrioventricular block, atrial tachycardia, and ventricular tachycardia. A Gaussian-based ECG is generated from the atrial and ventricular event sequences, while a multi-Gaussian PPG waveform is derived from ventricular activation using a beat-class-dependent electromechanical delay. The same processing architecture supports playback of recorded 12-lead clinical ECG data through an inverse lead transformation. The hardware uses an STM32F407VET6 microcontroller and MCP4921 digital-to-analog converters (DACs) to generate 10 synchronized analog outputs, comprising 09 ECG electrodes and 01 PPG channel. Validation covered physiological timing, analog-chain performance, and end-to-end signal reproduction. PR interval errors relative to a commercial electrocardiograph were 1.23 ms for normal sinus rhythm and 1.66 ms for first-degree atrioventricular block. The measured beat-to-beat PR increment during Mobitz I conduction was 40.02±0.04 ms for a programmed value of 40 ms. At commanded amplitudes of at least 800 mV, both output channels achieved absolute amplitude errors below 0.60%, total harmonic distortion below 1%, and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) above 30 dB. Inter-channel R-peak skew remained below the 2 ms sampling interval, and all monitored metrics varied by less than 1.5% during 60 min of continuous operation. Reproduction of a clinical 12-lead recording yielded per-lead R2 values of 0.967-0.986 and a cycle-to-cycle correlation of 0.996. The emulator also reproduced amplitude-dependent bias in automated interval measurements and interpretation labels. These results demonstrate a low-cost, open-source platform for reproducible device calibration, algorithm stress testing, medical training, and physiological signal processing research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.