Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740195›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

RESC: A Rubric-Guided Error-Score Consistency Framework for Action Quality Assessment in Vocational Fitter Training.

Wenfeng Mu, Shigang Wang, Jiajia Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenfeng MuSchool of Automation, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou 545006, China.ORCID 0009-0003-4352-6002
Shigang WangSchool of Automation, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou 545006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6868-6542
Jiajia HuangSchool of Automation, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou 545006, China.ORCID 0009-0004-0974-3887

Funding

Department of Science and Technology of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 2025GXNSFHA069207Education Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region YCSW2026621Guangxi University of Science and Technology GKYC202618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Action quality assessment in vocational fitter training is constrained by limited expert-annotated data and insufficiently interpretable predictions. To achieve accurate scoring and rubric-aligned, auditable explanations with limited data, this study proposes RESC, a rubric-guided error-score consistency framework. RESC uses human pose as its primary visual evidence and converts an instructor rubric into error semantics and scoring constraints. It therefore predicts an overall score while producing rubric-aligned error diagnoses and model-derived itemized deduction contributions. We constructed Fitter-AQA, a dataset of 134 filing videos from 25 participants, and evaluated the framework using strict leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. RESC achieved a mean absolute error of 4.450, a Pearson linear correlation coefficient of 0.902, and a Spearman rank correlation coefficient of 0.852, corresponding to the lowest pooled scoring errors and highest pooled correlations among the evaluated methods. Error diagnosis reached a Macro-F1 of 0.770 and a macro-average balanced accuracy of 0.824. These results indicate stable cross-subject scoring under limited-data conditions and transform model predictions into an auditable score decomposition aligned with rubric semantics. RESC thus provides an accurate and interpretable approach to automated assessment in vocational skills training.

Indexed as

action quality assessmenterror diagnosishuman pose estimationinterpretable scoringrubric-guided learningvocational fitter training

Identifiers

PMID42740195
PMCPMC13568246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.