ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multimodal Flotation Sensing: A Systematic Review of State Identification and Sensor Readiness.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable state identification is essential for intelligent flotation control because recovery, concentrate grade, entrainment, and mineral losses are only partially observable online. This systematic review examines field instrumentation, online analyzers, froth imaging, temporal synchronization, machine-vision methods, multimodal soft sensing, and the engineering requirements that determine whether a predictive model can operate as an industrial sensor. Scopus and Web of Science publications from 2021 to June 2026 were screened using a PRISMA-based protocol. The systematic evidence base includes 98 peer-reviewed technical studies published between 2021 and June 2026, and two PRISMA methodological publications are used to ensure the methodology for presenting the review. Additional methodological and contextual sources cited outside the systematic body of evidence are not included in the number of studies reflected in PRISMA. The evidence shows that machine vision is the most mature non-contact sensing approach, supporting bubble-size measurement, froth-velocity estimation, operating-state recognition, grade prediction, and visual monitoring. Current research is shifting from handcrafted descriptors toward convolutional, transformer, self-supervised, graph-based, temporal, and multimodal models. However, predictive accuracy alone does not demonstrate industrial readiness when camera geometry, illumination, contamination, delay compensation, temporal leakage, domain shift, uncertainty, inference latency, and SCADA/PLC integration are not evaluated. A five-dimensional Sensor Readiness Index is proposed to assess metrological validity, temporal integrity, validation rigor, operational robustness, and automation integration. The review defines the principal requirements for reliable industrial deployment of flotation sensing systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.