Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740176›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Real-Time Physiological Fatigue Prediction for Human-Robot Collaborative Manufacturing Using Wearable Sensor Fusion and Hybrid Deep Learning: An In Silico Digital Twin Study.

Claudio Urrea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Claudio UrreaElectrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Santiago of Chile, Las Sophoras 165, Estación Central, Santiago 9170020, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-7197-8928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal fatigue precedes much of the injury burden in manufacturing, yet most monitoring schemes register an injury only once it has occurred, which becomes critical where operators share a workspace with collaborative robots. This paper presents a wearable sensing platform and a learning pipeline that track operator fatigue continuously during human-robot collaborative assembly, evaluated in silico. Eight surface electromyography (sEMG) channels, six inertial measurement units, and four force-sensitive resistors feed a 127-dimensional descriptor computed over 30 s windows. Eight classifiers were trained on 1536 simulated working hours from 24 anthropometrically diverse synthetic operators. Under leave-operators-out cross-validation, a 1D-CNN-LSTM hybrid reached 89.3% three-class accuracy and 87.1% balanced accuracy with 73.9 k parameters and 22 ms inference on a Jetson Nano; a CNN-BiLSTM-attention model gained 0.3 percentage points for 1.6 times the parameters, a difference that was not statistically significant. Ablation attributed 7.0 points of balanced accuracy to sEMG and 5.0 points to three contextual variables requiring no sensor. Alerts preceded severe fatigue by roughly 12 min, and alert-triggered task reallocation cut peak shoulder load by 43% while retaining 94% of baseline throughput. Every result characterizes a simulated environment: the study establishes internal consistency, latency feasibility, and design trade-offs, and prospective validation with human operators remains a prerequisite for deployment.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFatigueRoboticsWearable Electronic DevicesComputer SimulationElectromyographyHumansdeep learningdigital twinfatigue predictionhuman–robot collaborationIndustry 5.0in silico validationmachine learningsensor fusionsurface electromyographywearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID42740176
PMCPMC13568440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.