ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Development of a Low-Cost Portable System for Text-to-Speech Conversion: A Mechanical-Aided Optical Solution for Educational Inclusion.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a low-cost assistive reading system based on a distributed architecture, in which an ESP32-CAM performs image acquisition while an Android application executes the image-processing, optical character recognition, and text-to-speech stages. The processing pipeline includes fixed-threshold binarization, morphological dilation, median filtering, Canny edge detection, and projection-based text segmentation. A key contribution is the mechanical sliding rule-frame, designed to maintain horizontal alignment between the camera and the printed text and to reduce perspective-related errors. The system was evaluated through 36 trials conducted with six participants under Low, Medium, and High Lighting conditions. A repeated-measures analysis showed a statistically significant effect of lighting on the Word Recognition Rate (WRR), with significantly lower performance under Low Lighting than under Medium and High Lighting, while no significant difference was found between Medium and High Lighting. Across all trials, the prototype achieved an overall mean WRR of 76.53%, with a median of 78.75% and a maximum observed WRR of 97.50%. Exploratory participant-level correlations between mean WRR, age, and prior reading experience were not statistically significant and were interpreted cautiously because of the small sample size. These findings provide preliminary evidence of the technical feasibility of combining mechanical alignment with a low-cost portable reading architecture for educational accessibility, while highlighting the need for further validation with larger samples and more diverse operating conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.