Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740171›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comparative Analysis of Support Vector Machine Variants for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensor Data.

Minh Long Hoang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Minh Long HoangDepartment of Engineering and Architecture, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3622-4327

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using wearable sensor data is widely applied in healthcare, smart environments, and mobile systems. Support Vector Machines (SVMs) are commonly used for HAR due to their strong generalization ability. However, traditional approaches often rely on single kernels and may not fully capture complex motion patterns. This research presents a comparative analysis of seven SVM-based methods, including Multiclass SVMs, Radial Basis Function (RBF) SVMs, Kernel Engineering SVMs, Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL) SVMs, Class-Weighted SVMs, Least Squares SVM approximation, and Online Incremental SVMs. A unified experimental framework with consistent preprocessing and hyperparameter tuning using Grid Search with cross-validation is employed to ensure fair evaluation. Results show that kernel-based methods outperform linear and approximate models. The MKL SVM achieves the highest accuracy, slightly surpassing the RBF baseline, by combining multiple kernels to capture diverse data characteristics. Kernel Engineering SVM also improves performance, while Fuzzy and LS-SVM provide competitive results with enhanced robustness. In contrast, Multiclass and Online SVM exhibit lower accuracy. Thes results demonstrate that improving feature representation through advanced kernel design is key to enhancing HAR performance.

Indexed as

Human ActivitiesSupport Vector MachineWearable Electronic DevicesAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsHumansSoft ComputingHuman Activity Recognitionhyperparameter optimizationkernel methodsMultiple Kernel LearningSupport Vector Machinewearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID42740171
PMCPMC13568279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.