ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Automated Road Marking Wear Assessment via Multimodal Fusion of LiDAR Intensity and YOLOv11 Semantic Segmentation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Road markings support lane guidance, traffic regulation, and machine perception, but their field inspection still depends largely on manual surveys or local retroreflectivity measurements. This study presents a vehicle-mounted inspection framework that fuses LiDAR intensity with camera-based semantic segmentation for automated road marking wear assessment. The platform integrates LiDAR, a stereo camera, IMU, GNSS, and an industrial computer. LiDAR-inertial mapping provides spatial alignment, while ground filtering, region-of-interest extraction, and adaptive intensity thresholding generate preliminary marking candidates. A YOLOv11 segmentation model produces pixel-level marking masks, and LiDAR candidates are projected onto the image plane for semantic confirmation. Confirmed points are accumulated into grid cells and evaluated using reflectance, point density, fusion retention, and geometric coverage indicators. In a representative route, 2441 grid units were analyzed: 1210 units were valid for formal grading, with 1060 good, 131 slightly worn, and 19 moderately worn units; 1231 units were reserved for review. The mean composite score of the valid grids was 0.906. A five-report aggregate further showed that 87.2% of the units received valid wear categories. The results indicate that multimodal fusion transforms road marking inspection into a quantitative, spatially referenced, and reportable process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.