ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Boundary-Transition Characterization in High-Speed Underwater Bubble Imaging Under Broadband and Narrow-Band Illumination.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterizing gas-liquid boundaries in underwater high-speed images is complicated by optical propagation and interface effects that broaden intensity transitions. Whether narrower transitions also indicate more accurate boundary localization, however, remains unclear. We integrated broadband white and narrow-band blue, green, and yellow source conditions with configuration-specific RBW processing at nominal observation distances of 0.7 and 5.0 m. Each source-distance condition was represented by one acquisition run, from which 20 temporally separated frames were analyzed as frame-level subsamples. In the 5.0 m run, the observed mean RBW was 17.46% under the blue-source condition and 36.18% under the white-source condition, corresponding to a descriptive reduction of 51.73%. A sensitivity analysis based on the interquartile range (IQR) yielded a descriptive reduction of 33.42%, whereas the near-field means were similar across source conditions. Target-plane optical irradiance and camera spectral responsivity were not calibrated. These values therefore describe source-condition responses of the complete imaging chain rather than isolated wavelength effects. A 12-image near-field holdout set annotated by two observers was used to compare the proposed estimator with classical and learning-based edge detectors. This image-reference benchmark did not support a claim of superior localization, and RBW showed little monotonic association with normalized image-reference localization discrepancy within the holdout set. The results characterize within-run image responses rather than reproducible source-condition effects. They support RBW as a descriptor of processed transition width, but not as a measure of physical boundary-localization accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.