Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740163›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Earthquake Monitoring: A Systematic Review of Distributed Acoustic Sensing Applications.

Nimra Iqbal, Izzatdin Bin Abdul Aziz, Halimaton Saadiah Bt Hakimi, Muhammad Faisal Raza, Alidu Rashid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nimra IqbalDepartment of Computer & Information Sciences, Universiti Teknologi Petronas (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.
Izzatdin Bin Abdul AzizDepartment of Computer & Information Sciences, Universiti Teknologi Petronas (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-2654-4463
Halimaton Saadiah Bt HakimiDepartment of Computer & Information Sciences, Universiti Teknologi Petronas (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-0139-748X
Muhammad Faisal RazaDepartment of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.
Alidu RashidDepartment of Petrolleum Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-3394-4991

Funding

TOTALENERGIES EP MALAYSIA 015MD0-166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Earthquakes remain among the most destructive natural hazards, necessitating reliable monitoring and early warning systems for effective risk mitigation. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have significantly improved seismic signal analysis, enabling more accurate event detection, phase picking, classification, and magnitude estimation. This study presents a systematic review of ML- and DL-based approaches for earthquake monitoring, with particular emphasis on Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) as an emerging technology for high-resolution, real-time seismic observation. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar, yielding 252,223 initial records. After applying the predefined publication period, removing duplicate records, conducting relevance screening, and performing eligibility assessment, 138 peer-reviewed studies published between 2021 and 2025 were retained for detailed analysis and synthesis. The review reveals a significant transition from conventional signal-processing techniques to advanced artificial intelligence-based approaches, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) networks, Transformer-based architectures, hybrid models, and Bayesian learning methods for uncertainty quantification. The findings further demonstrate that Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) has emerged as a transformative sensing technology because of its dense spatial coverage, high spatial resolution, and continuous monitoring capability. However, several challenges remain, including the lack of standardized datasets, limited model generalization across diverse geological settings, insufficient model interpretability, high computational complexity, and the limited integration of uncertainty-aware approaches for real-time seismic monitoring. This review identifies these critical research gaps and highlights promising future research directions, including multimodal data fusion, interpretable artificial intelligence, physics-informed learning, self-supervised learning, and robust uncertainty quantification for next-generation intelligent seismic monitoring systems. Unlike previous review studies that primarily focus on individual machine learning techniques or conventional seismic monitoring, this review provides a comprehensive and systematic synthesis of recent advances in machine learning, deep learning, and Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS), identifies current research gaps, and offers practical recommendations to guide future research on intelligent earthquake monitoring systems.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdistributed acoustic sensing (DAS)machine learningseismic event detectionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42740163
PMCPMC13568315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.