ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Federated Anomaly Detection for IoT-Enabled EV Charging Cybersecurity Under Aggressive and Stealth Cyberattacks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid deployment of Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructures introduces cybersecurity challenges due to distributed operation, communication dependency, and exposure to malicious cyberattacks. Existing anomaly detection approaches mainly rely on centralized learning architectures that require raw charging data, creating privacy concerns, scalability limitations, and reduced robustness against stealth cyberattacks that mimic legitimate charging behavior. To address these issues, this paper proposes a privacy-preserving federated cybersecurity framework for IoT-based EV charging infrastructures using distributed anomaly detection. The framework integrates cybersecurity-aware feature engineering, aggressive and stealth cyberattack simulation, centralized anomaly detection, and federated learning without raw charging session sharing. A real-world EV charging dataset is utilized to model legitimate and malicious charging behavior using operational and engineered features, including charging ratio and power consistency. Experimental evaluation compares Isolation Forest, centralized LSTM autoencoder, and federated LSTM anomaly detection under aggressive and stealth cyberattack scenarios. The results show that aggressive cyberattacks are more easily separable, where Isolation Forest achieves an attack F1-score of 0.85 and AUC of 0.86, while stealth cyberattacks reduce detection performance, lowering the F1-score to 0.61. The centralized LSTM autoencoder demonstrates superior detection performance, whereas the federated LSTM preserves privacy and achieves competitive results with 0.86 accuracy, 0.67 attack F1-score, and 0.81 AUC without transmitting raw charging data. These findings demonstrate federated anomaly detection as a promising privacy-preserving solution for secure EV charging infrastructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.