ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Development and Validation of an Automated Pipeline for Motor Unit Analysis from HD-sEMG Signals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) enables non-invasive analysis of motor unit (MU) behavior and is crucial in rehabilitation, pathophysiological assessment, and assistive technologies. However, current pipelines still rely on expert intervention, particularly for spike-train editing and channel selection for motor unit conduction velocity (MUCV) estimation. This study developed and validated an automated pipeline for MU analysis from HD-sEMG signals acquired during isometric trapezoidal contractions. The pipeline integrates blind source separation (BSS)-based decomposition, automated source validation and spike-train selection, estimation of discharge rate (DR), recruitment threshold (RT), and automatic channel selection for MUCV. Validation was first performed on a public dataset containing manually edited spike trains from eight operators. The proposed procedure matched 106 of 135 reference MUs with an overall median rate of agreement of 0.98 among matched MUs. Sensitivity analysis supported the robustness of the predefined parameters. The complete pipeline was then evaluated on 276 HD-sEMG signals acquired from the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of nine healthy volunteers in four sessions using a custom-built acquisition device. The resulting MU parameters were physiologically plausible, and within-session tracking showed high repeatability of MU properties even after electrode repositioning. Validation was limited to healthy volunteers, and further evaluation in clinical populations is needed. These findings support the feasibility of reducing operator dependency while maintaining the quality of HD-sEMG-based MU analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.