ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Cross-Source Prediction of a Visual Load Index from Vehicle Kinematic Features: A Driver-Independent Validation Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Continuous eye tracking is difficult to deploy in production vehicles, while eye-movement-derived proxy labels are susceptible to same-source circularity and road-type confounding. We propose a driver-independent, confounder-aware cross-source framework in which the eye-movement-derived visual load index (VLI) proxy is constructed within training folds, whereas held-out prediction uses only vehicle kinematics and an optional driving-style prior. Evaluation used naturalistic data from 33 drivers, comprising 24,437 windows along a 48.4 km route, under driver-grouped cross-validation with driver-level bootstrap confidence intervals and control and increment tests. The vehicle-only model achieved an AUC of 0.589 across held-out drivers, rising to 0.633 with the style prior. After controlling for road type, vehicle features improved AUC by 0.042 (95% CI: 0.006-0.078), indicating measurable information beyond the binary road-type proxy; the style increment remained exploratory because its confidence interval included zero. Future-state prediction converged to a persistence baseline at 20 s. The VLI was not externally validated against an independent subjective or physiological criterion; accordingly, the findings are limited to cross-source prediction of an eye-movement-derived proxy. Across five architectures, this cross-source pattern was directionally consistent, supporting prospective evaluation of vehicle kinematics as a complementary sensing channel in multisource driver-monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.