ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Agentic LLM Compilation of Adaptive Sampling Policies for Low-Power IoT Sensing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Battery-powered sensors must sample sparingly to conserve energy while still reconstructing the signal faithfully between measurements, and the decision logic must fit microcontroller-class hardware. We use a large language model (LLM) as an offline policy compiler: given a natural-language task description and a compact rule grammar, it returns policies as a few numeric thresholds and integer periods, under 100 bytes. No weights are fitted and the model never sees the raw series, only eight summary statistics: the approach is training-free but statistics-informed. Policies come from an agentic loop: a generator LLM proposes candidates, a deterministic evaluator scores each exactly on the recorded trace, and an optimizer LLM refines them over eight rounds. We evaluate Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Fable 5, ChatGPT 5.4 and ChatGPT 5.5, five seeds each, on the Beijing PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.