ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
EARDC: Energy-Aware Reaction-Diffusion-Based Clustering for Area Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Energy-efficient clustering extends the lifetime of wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Conventional protocols such as LEACH and HEED primarily address communication energy and cluster head (CH) selection rather than area coverage under random deployment. C3 considers coverage and redundancy without node coordinates; however, its virtual-ring reconfiguration is initiated by a sink or reference node. In this paper, we propose Energy-Aware Reaction-Diffusion Clustering (EARDC), a self-organizing, coordinate-free, and decentralized framework for energy-efficient area coverage in randomly deployed WSNs. EARDC determines CH formation, cluster membership, and temporary sleep states from information exchanged among one-hop neighbors. It requires neither exact node coordinates, sink-initiated reconfiguration, nor network-wide coverage information computed at the base station. A residual-energy-scaled activator-inhibitor update supports self-organized CH selection, and local membership control determines the active sensing set from selected CHs and accepted members. Other non-CH nodes sleep until the next scheduled clustering epoch. Analytical approximations for active-node density and coverage are evaluated against run-level simulation measurements to assess their accuracy and limitations. Simulations at three deployment densities characterize the tradeoff among network lifetime, coverage retention, active participation, and sensing redundancy. EARDC provides longer network lifetime and a smaller active fraction than LEACH, HEED, and WIFN. C3 provides stronger redundancy suppression. In the dense deployment, the lifetime-maximizing EARDC setting has shorter coverage retention than C3 but a longer coverage-bounded lifetime. These results show that network lifetime and sustained area coverage represent distinct performance objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.