Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740118›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Intelligent Recognition of Building Facade Defects: A Multilevel Review from Visual Perception to Engineering Operations and Maintenance.

Jianhua Liu, Chen Li, Xinyu Wang, Bozhen Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jianhua LiuMobile Geospatial Big Data Cloud Service Innovation Team, Aerospace Remote Sensing Intelligent Computing Joint Laboratory, The School of Geomatics and Urban Spatial Informatics, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0130-9520
Chen LiMobile Geospatial Big Data Cloud Service Innovation Team, Aerospace Remote Sensing Intelligent Computing Joint Laboratory, The School of Geomatics and Urban Spatial Informatics, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.ORCID 0009-0000-1526-6328
Xinyu WangMobile Geospatial Big Data Cloud Service Innovation Team, Aerospace Remote Sensing Intelligent Computing Joint Laboratory, The School of Geomatics and Urban Spatial Informatics, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.
Bozhen WangMobile Geospatial Big Data Cloud Service Innovation Team, Aerospace Remote Sensing Intelligent Computing Joint Laboratory, The School of Geomatics and Urban Spatial Informatics, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.

Funding

Key Laboratory of Water Security Guarantee for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei IWHR-JJJ-202404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building facades are continually exposed to weathering, material aging, hygrothermal cycling, and service-related disturbances. Cracks, delamination, spalling, and seepage can compromise durability and safety, while associated thermal anomalies provide indirect evidence of deterioration. Deep learning, UAV inspection, infrared thermography, LiDAR, building information modeling (BIM), and digital twins have shifted facade inspection toward automated sensing and spatially referenced assessment. Yet most studies remain focused on isolated measures of model accuracy and give limited attention to the full pathway from detection and quantification to component localization, condition rating, and repair. This review organizes the evidence along five dimensions: annotation granularity (A0-A2/A2*), visual task hierarchy (T1-T5), fusion level (F0-F3), spatial mapping level (S0-S3), and engineering maturity (M1-M3). The synthesis indicates that acquisition conditions, material heterogeneity, negative-sample composition, and annotation rules constrain model generalization. Single-modality methods cover classification, detection, segmentation, and partial geometric quantification, but facade-specific external validation remains limited. Multimodal gains depend on registration quality, thermophysical conditions, defect mechanisms, and sensor reliability. Mapping two-dimensional outputs to point clouds, BIM, and digital twins is technically feasible, but error propagation, component matching, and condition-rating protocols remain inconsistent. Interpretability tools and vision foundation models may support verification, annotation, and reporting but cannot replace dedicated systems with validated error bounds. Future work should prioritize cross-dataset benchmarks, facade-specific lightweight models, reproducible multimodal evaluation, standardized 2D-to-3D accuracy protocols, uncertainty-aware manual review, and engineering condition-rating frameworks.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebuilding facade condition assessmentdigital twinfacade defect recognitionmultimodal data fusion

Identifiers

PMID42740118
PMCPMC13568442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.