ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Response Characteristics of Key Filtering Parameters and Applicability of Interference Detection for Integrated Navigation Under Spoofing Interference.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) spoofing threats to Inertial Navigation System (INS)/GNSS integrated navigation systems, this paper analyzes the internal error propagation mechanisms and quantifies perturbation patterns within the Kalman filter (KF) architecture. Mathematical models for step-type, linear ramp, and nonlinear smooth ramp spoofing are established, and the Anomaly Signal-to-Noise Ratio (ASNR) is adopted to quantify disturbances across four core filtering dimensions based on real-world vehicular test data. The results demonstrate that filtering innovations at the forefront of information fusion respond most directly and sensitively (peaking at an ASNR of 341.4181) with a standard zero-mean Gaussian baseline, serving as the optimal metric for spoofing detection; in contrast, error states exhibit marked amplitude attenuation (maximum ASNR of 116.3291), while filter gains and state covariance show negligible variations (maximum ASNRs of 22.6023 and 19.3014, respectively). Further evaluation of Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) accuracy constraints reveals that under step spoofing, position innovations remain robust (ASNR: 260-510), whereas velocity innovation ASNR drops by approximately 50% with IMU degradation; under linear ramp spoofing, velocity innovations dominate the response (ASNR: 41.16-70.46) while position innovations decay markedly; and under nonlinear smooth ramp spoofing, overall innovations are suppressed, and low-grade IMUs suffer severe noise masking (peak horizontal ASNRs dropping below 10), significantly enhancing attack stealthiness. The findings provide quantitative empirical evidence and theoretical guidance for anti-spoofing design in integrated navigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.