ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Adaptive Block Relative Edge Density (ABRED): An Interpretable Feature for Tunnel Surrounding Rock Fracture Identification.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fracture density estimation from tunnel face imagery is a critical step in rock mass classification and quantification of fragmentation severity. However, traditional texture descriptors have three inherent drawbacks: fixed spatial partitioning, sensitivity to illumination, and lack of modeling of local contrast variations. To overcome these problems, we propose the Adaptive Block Relative Edge Density (ABRED) feature as a physically motivated, interpretable design for geological image interpretation. A quadtree decomposition guided by local gradient variance dynamically adjusts region granulation to be finer in areas with denser fracture and coarser otherwise. ABRED directly calculates relative edge density, where relative edge density is defined as the ratio of a block's normalized edge count to the mean edge count of its eight neighboring blocks, demonstrating empirical robustness to illumination variations in our tests. Multi-scale representation is performed by aggregating Gaussian blur edge density maps on gradually blurring scales. Compared to fixed-grid competitors and handcrafted features, including LBP, HOG, and Gabor, ABRED achieves an overall classification performance of 87.6% on an operational, real-world dataset of 1200 tunnel surrounding rock images annotated with three unique fracture severity classes, significantly outperforming baseline fixed-grid methods and handcrafted feature approaches. Ablation studies confirm each component contributes individually, while PCA-based embedding results in well-separated, class-discriminative clusters. Importantly, by incorporating domain-specific physical information directly into its feature engineering-the opposite of data-driven black box optimization-ABRED achieves performance comparable to recent deep learning approaches on our specific dataset (87.6% vs. 88-91% reported for CNN-based methods under similar conditions), while requiring substantially lower computational overhead and offering full interpretability. We note, however, that deep learning models may achieve superior accuracy given substantially larger training datasets. The advantage of ABRED lies in its efficiency, transparency, and suitability for CPU-based field deployment where resources are constrained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.