ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Understanding Human Motion from Depth Sensors: Activity Recognition and Age Group Recognition Using Skeleton Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human Activity Recognition (HAR) plays a significant role in various applications, from learning a discipline to physical rehabilitation. In older adults, activity patterns can indicate levels of frailty, which helps inform the design of physical training programs to prevent falls and maintain mobility. HAR sensing ranges from wearable sensors such as IMUs and RGB cameras to video, specialized gait laboratories, perturbation units, VR, and other modalities. This paper presents a comprehensive study of depth-based, skeleton-driven HAR and age group recognition (AGR) using data collected from real-world nursing home environments. Depth sensors offer a privacy-preserving and non-invasive alternative to wearable and RGB-based systems, enabling continuous 24-h monitoring without requiring user compliance. We systematically evaluate multiple modeling paradigms, including classical machine learning models (DT, RF, KNN, SVM, HMM, HMM+SVM), sequence-based models (LSTM, TCN, ARNN), and graph-based approaches, using skeletal joint data extracted from depth images. Experiments are conducted on two heterogeneous datasets: NTU RGB+D (younger adults) and ETAP-DID (older adults). We analyze the impact of different joint subset configurations (full-body, limb-only, leg-only, and torso-only) and compare raw joint representations with handcrafted time-series features (TSFEL) for frame-based HAR. Beyond activity recognition, we introduce an AGR pipeline to distinguish younger from older adults based on skeletal motion patterns. We investigate multiple feature representations, including absolute joint positions, root-relative coordinates, bone vectors, and joint velocities, and provide interpretability through feature importance and saliency analysis to identify age-discriminative joints and motion cues. Our study provides a comprehensive analysis of various HAR models applied to depth data, examining model performance and the contribution of joint-based features to HAR and AGR. Our study highlights the potential for personalized privacy-preserved monitoring and intervention in nursing homes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.