ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Microwave Radar Sensing for Non-Invasive Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: A Simulation-Based Analysis with Phantom Testing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntra-abdominal pressure (IAP) has recently been recognized as a new vital sign in critically ill patients. Microwave reflectometry has been proposed as a potential approach for non-invasive IAP measurement. However, systematic investigation on how individual anatomical and geometric factors influence changes in the microwave reflection response of the abdominal compartment is limited. Complementary information regarding illumination frequency and specific absorption rate (SAR) also warrants consideration.
objectiveThis study aimed to advance the current knowledge on using microwave radar-based sensors in IAP monitoring by studying the most influencing factors. The penetration depth and spot size versus radiation frequency is studied as well. Information on energy deposition due to radio-frequency exposure is investigated too.
methodsNumerical simulations were performed using abdominal models adjusted to represent different IAP levels. Reflection signal features were analyzed in relation to IAP-induced changes, and SAR was calculated using human models. Subsequently, a radar sensor prototype was tested on a benchtop abdominal phantom. Lin's concordance correlation analysis was used to evaluate absolute agreement between radar-estimated IAP and reference IAP. Additional statistical analyses assessed bias, precision, concordance, and risk levels.
resultsSagittal abdominal diameter was the dominant factor affecting the microwave reflection response. Reflection amplitude showed a periodic trend consistent with abdominal displacement corresponding to multiples of half-wavelength values of the applied electromagnetic waves. Numerical SAR simulations showed increasing SAR with frequency while remaining below the applicable exposure limits under the investigated conditions. The radar sensor showed a bias of 0.43 mmHg and a precision of 2.55 mmHg. Concordance analysis among the paired changes remaining after application of the predefined exclusion criteria showed agreement in the direction of IAP change.
conclusionThe present study should be considered a preliminary proof of concept. Clinically, the technology is currently more suitable for early warning and trend monitoring than for precise absolute IAP measurement, and it does not yet replace standard intravesical measurements. Its ability to support clinical decision-making, including guiding fluid therapy, requires prospective validation in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.