ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Electrostatic Charge-Based Online Monitoring of the Grinding Process.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable online condition monitoring is essential for maintaining process stability and guaranteeing machining quality in precision grinding. Against this background, this study proposes an electrostatic induction-based measurement strategy and further performs systematic comparisons with conventional force-based monitoring methods. First, an electrostatic sensor model is established to quantitatively characterize charge transfer behaviors during grinding interactions. A three-axis experimental grinding platform is deployed to correlate electrostatic responses and mechanical force signals with critical grinding variables, including grinding speed, depth of cut, feed rate, and wheel wear severity. To achieve quantitative and objective evaluation, a unit-free Dynamic Sensitivity Change Degree (DSCD) index is introduced. Comparative results based on the DSCD index reveal that electrostatic signals exhibit better performance than traditional force-based signals in tracking grinding wheel speed variations and progressive wear evolution under the tested conditions. Meanwhile, the DSCD fluctuation in electrostatic signals remains within 1% under varying cutting depths, indicating favorable linear stability within the scope of the present experiments. Furthermore, a Generalized Conditional Variational Auto-Encoder (G-CVAE) model is developed to augment insufficient wheel wear datasets. The generated synthetic signals exhibit high fidelity and enable accurate and robust classification of grinding wheel wear states. This study verifies the existence of explicit quantitative correlations between electrostatic induction signals and key grinding parameters as well as wheel wear conditions. The proposed monitoring method can provide high-quality, reliable data support for subsequent grinding condition assessment and intelligent process decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.