ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Dimensionally Consistent Formation Pressure Prediction from Borehole Sensing Data Using Pressure Ratio Symbolic Regression.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Formation pressure labels are often stored as equivalent mud weight (EMW), whereas engineering analysis requires true pressure and validation strategies that account for the strong depth dependence of borehole data. This study develops a dimensionally consistent pressure ratio symbolic regression framework in which vertical overburden stress provides the pressure scale and a compact dimensionless correction is learned from reference-scaled borehole variables. After converting EMW-based labels to MPa and applying transparent quality control criteria, 1877 of 2025 depth-indexed records were retained. Redundant and deterministically derived variables were identified through correlation analysis, variance inflation factors, principal component analysis, and deterministic relation checks and were excluded from the compact symbolic search. Five contiguous depth blocks with a 20 m purge zone were used for leakage-resistant validation, with symbolic-structure selection repeated within each outer training fold. The selected four-coefficient expression, comprising an intercept and three predictor-dependent terms, retained only depth and acoustic slowness. Fixed-structure depth-block validation yielded a coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.