ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Gradient-Based Efficient Optimization Method for Surface Sensor Arrays in Microseismic Source Mechanism Inversion.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accuracy of microseismic moment tensor inversion critically depends on the spatial configuration of surface sensor arrays, quantified by the condition number κ(G) of the dynamic response matrix. Existing optimization methods suffer from slow convergence and unreliability due to the fundamental lack of gradient information. In this specific context, the analytical gradient of κ(G) with respect to sensor positions via singular value perturbation theory and the chain rule of direction cosines are derived for the first time in this paper. Based on the analytical gradient, three optimization strategies are established: a BFGS quasi-Newton method with quadratic penalty (BP) for smoothly constrained regions; a sequential quadratic programming method (FMC/SQP) achieving the lowest condition numbers across all shapes with approximately 5000 evaluations; and a center-boundary parameterization method (CB) that exploits the structural regularity of optimal configurations to reduce variables from 2N to N-1, requiring only approximately 300 evaluations (1/16 of FMC). Systematic experiments on five region shapes and two complex constraint scenarios demonstrate that gradient methods achieve a 15-30% reduction in κ across 4 of 5 shapes and a 5-31-fold improvement in robustness, with FMC reducing the average condition number by 25% at 15.4-fold better robustness than the baseline. Synthetic inversion experiments confirm that reducing κ from approximately 1.5×104 to approximately 50 reduces moment tensor inversion error by approximately 50-fold. The analytical gradient framework is transferable to sensor placement problems across multiple disciplines, and the three-method toolchain offers a graduated accuracy-efficiency trade-off for practical deployment optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.