ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Frequency Stability Degradation in Quartz and MEMS Oscillators.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The operating frequency of a resonant oscillator is determined by the coupled behavior of the resonator, sustaining electronics, package, power supply, mounting conditions, and operating environment. Frequency stability is critical in sensor systems, where oscillators provide references for sampling, synchronization, phase-sensitive measurements, sensor fusion, and distributed sensing. This review examines how these factors affect the short- and long-term stability of quartz oscillators (XOs, TCXOs, and OCXOs) and microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) oscillators. Organized by physical cause rather than device type, the review covers temperature, including gradients and hysteresis, aging, acceleration, vibration, shock, pressure, humidity, power-supply and load variations, electric and magnetic fields, electromagnetic interference, and ionizing radiation. For each factor, the dominant degradation mechanisms and compensation methods are compared across both technologies. The comparison indicates that OCXOs retain an advantage in low-noise timekeeping over long averaging times, whereas advanced MEMS oscillators can approach quartz performance in selected operating regimes while offering smaller size, monolithic integration, and, in ruggedized products, 0.01 ppb/g acceleration sensitivity and 20,000 g shock ratings. In the literature reviewed, appropriate measurement methods exist but are applied inconsistently across technologies. Oscillator selection should therefore be based on a comprehensive error budget covering all relevant environmental and system-level factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.