ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Pose Compensation Method for Robotic Manipulators Based on Transformer.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Industrial robots, particularly six-axis serial manipulators, have been widely deployed in manufacturing workflows including assembly, welding, material handling, inspection and precision machining. As the demand for higher end-effector positioning accuracy and trajectory tracking performance grows, end-position errors induced during manipulator operation-stemming from geometric deviations, joint friction, load fluctuations, current surges, as well as variations in velocity and acceleration-have emerged as a critical bottleneck limiting high-precision applications. Conventional error compensation approaches mostly rely on geometric calibration, empirical formulas or fixed regression algorithms, which struggle to adequately characterize error trends featuring strong temporal dependencies, nonlinearity and multi-factor coupling. To address the aforementioned limitations, this paper takes the UR5 industrial manipulator as the research object. Leveraging the NIST-released dataset for manipulator positional accuracy degradation monitoring, this study develops and implements a physics-aware Transformer-based compensation framework that integrates a physics-consistent constraint loss and a nonlinear exponential error amplification strategy with a standard Transformer encoder for end-effector positional accuracy degradation. Multiple variables including target joint position, velocity, acceleration, torque, motor current and control current are selected to construct time-window input vectors, which are used to train the Transformer regression model to capture the correlation between historical motion states and real-time end-effector positional accuracy degradation. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed Transformer model can fully capture temporal contextual correlations and multi-feature fusion information embedded within manipulator kinematic data, delivering superior error compensation performance for the six-dimensional end-effector pose error prediction task. The self-attention-based time-series modeling framework is well-suited to the nonlinear, coupled and time-varying characteristics of manipulator operational errors. This work provides valuable references for accuracy enhancement of industrial robots and the design of intelligent error compensation schemes. This work provides valuable references for accuracy enhancement of industrial robots and the design of intelligent error compensation schemes, with the proposed physics-aware strategies being model-agnostic and potentially extensible to other regression architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.