ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
FL-BC-IDS: Evidence-Native Privacy-Aware Hierarchical Federated Intrusion Detection for the Internet of Vehicles.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internet of Vehicles (IoV) intrusion detection systems (IDSs) require collaborative learning that preserves raw-data locality while producing independently checkable post-run evidence. This paper presents FL-BC-IDS, an evidence-native, privacy-aware hierarchical federated IDS in which vehicles train Differentially Private XGBoost models, roadside units perform deterministic admission and tree-bagging aggregation, and the GLOBAL stage forms an equal-weight ensemble over validated RSU models. Signed reports, privacy records, SHA-256/Poseidon commitments, scoped Groth16 proofs, reconstructable public inputs, and digest-pinned blockchain receipts provide a unified verification path. Across 10 seed-controlled runs, the mean ± SD accuracy/F1 values were 0.998021±0.000246/0.983597±0.002053 on CSE-CIC-IDS2018 and 0.999867±0.000152/0.999495±0.000579 on CICIoV2024. With thresholds fixed exclusively from development data, the strict held-out-attack macro recall was 0.8031 and 0.9090 on CSE-CIC-IDS2018 and CICIoV2024, respectively, indicating residual attack-specific generalization limitations; supervised rolling-origin temporal refresh on CSE-CIC-IDS2018 achieved 0.984788 pooled seen-attack recall at a 0.005700 test FPR. A controlled 20-vehicle, eight-round heterogeneity and participation stress test retained 0.998151 accuracy and 0.984782 F1-score. Verification rejected invalid or context-mismatched artifacts and independently checked model-anchor consistency, RSU aggregation replay, commitments, and public inputs. The reported DP budgets are conditional learner-stage bounds for learner-input record instances, not end-to-end guarantees for original pre-preprocessing records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.