Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740009›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Effect of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Running Performance and Inertial Measurement Unit-Derived Spatiotemporal Parameters in Endurance-Trained Runners.

Isabella Sierra, Yiyang Chen, Gleydciane Alexandre Fernandes, Henri Lajeunesse, Julien Clouette, Alexandra Potvin-Desrochers, Jenna C Gibbs, Julie N Côté, Fabien A Basset, Caroline Paquette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Isabella SierraDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H2W 1S4, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-3046-552X
Yiyang ChenDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H2W 1S4, Canada.
Gleydciane Alexandre FernandesDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H2W 1S4, Canada.
Henri LajeunesseDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H2W 1S4, Canada.
Julien ClouetteDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H2W 1S4, Canada.
Alexandra Potvin-DesrochersDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H2W 1S4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5621-4863
Jenna C GibbsDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H2W 1S4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8275-779X
Julie N CôtéDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H2W 1S4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6155-8946
Fabien A BassetSchool of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1C 5S7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0759-5583
Caroline PaquetteDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H2W 1S4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8109-5301

Funding

Sylvan Adams Sports Science Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating wearable motion sensing with neuromodulation may improve understanding of how alterations in neural excitability influence running performance and biomechanics. This study investigated whether intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), or both regions influences running performance and sensor-derived spatiotemporal parameters during a 3000 m time-trial run. Ten endurance-trained runners (7 males) completed four stimulation conditions (M1, DLPFC, M1 + DLPFC, and sham) in a randomized, sham-controlled, repeated-measures crossover design. Running performance and spatiotemporal gait parameters were continuously monitored using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs), with analyses conducted across the initial, steady-state, and final acceleration phases of the run. The M1 + DLPFC condition resulted in the fastest mean completion time, averaging approximately three seconds faster than sham. However, these differences were not statistically significant. Sensor-derived biomechanical measures revealed significantly higher running speeds and alterations in stride time and step frequency during the initial phase following combined stimulation compared with the other conditions. Ratings of perceived exertion and spatiotemporal variability did not differ between stimulation conditions. These findings demonstrate the utility of wearable IMUs for detecting subtle phase-specific changes in running biomechanics and suggest that combined stimulation of motor and cognitive control regions may influence early-stage running performance, warranting further investigation in larger cohorts. As the complete sample consisted of only ten runners, these findings are preliminary and require confirmation in a larger sample size.

Indexed as

Physical EnduranceRunningAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexFemaleGaitHumansMaleMotor CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationWearable Electronic DevicesYoung Adultinertial measurement unitneuromodulationrunning performancespatiotemporal parameters

Identifiers

PMID42740009
PMCPMC13568317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.