ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Rotating Machinery Fault Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review and Emerging Trends.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rotating machinery is essential to energy, aerospace, manufacturing, and other safety-critical industries. Although deep-learning-based fault diagnosis has achieved high accuracy, its black-box nature limits trust, verification, and industrial deployment. This review examines explainable artificial intelligence for rotating machinery fault diagnosis and classifies existing methods into ante hoc and post hoc approaches according to their integration with model architectures. Their physical interpretability, applicable fault scenarios, explanation quality, computational overhead, robustness, and edge-deployment potential are critically compared. Quantitative criteria, including fidelity, stability, robustness, localization, and physical consistency are discussed to support objective evaluation of explanations. The review further highlights the gap between laboratory validation and industrial operation, particularly under sensor degradation, electromagnetic interference, variable working conditions, limited computing resources, and scarce fault data. It also discusses how model-relative explanations can be mapped to calibrated vibration quantities, fault-characteristic frequencies, industrial diagnostic standards, and actionable maintenance decisions. The distinction between correlation-based attribution and causal root-cause analysis is clarified, together with the role of digital twins and human-in-the-loop decision support. Finally, future research priorities are identified in standardized benchmarking, robust lightweight models, causal reasoning, and human-centered industrial deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.