ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Design and Fitting Performance of a 3D-Printed Personalized Upper-Limb Socket: A Comparative Case Report.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prosthetic socket is the essential interface between the residual limb and the prosthesis. However, traditional upper-limb sockets are highly sensitive to residual-limb volume fluctuations and rely on experience-dependent manual fabrication processes. Additive manufacturing and 3D scanning technologies offer the possibility of producing personalized sockets, potentially improving accessibility, repeatability, and cost-effectiveness. Despite this potential, there is still a lack of systematic experimental validation directly comparing the fitting performance of personalized 3D-printed sockets with that of conventionally manufactured sockets. This study presents the design, fabrication, and comparative validation of a personalized 3D-printed upper-limb socket and a traditionally manufactured socket produced for the same user. The 3D-printed socket was developed from a 3D scanning of a clinically rectified plaster mold, computer-aided design, and material extrusion by thermal reaction bonding. A comparative validation framework evaluated both sockets under equivalent conditions, including mechanical testing, thermal behavior assessment, and sensorized fitting measurements. The results provide quantitative evidence on how a personalized 3D-printed socket performs relative to a traditional socket in terms of structural behavior, thermal patterns, and interface-related fitting parameters. This work contributes objective data supporting 3D-printed personalized sockets as a technically feasible and promising alternative to conventional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.