Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42739994›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Design and Fitting Performance of a 3D-Printed Personalized Upper-Limb Socket: A Comparative Case Report.

J Carlos Díaz-Fernández, Alba Roda-Sales, Carlos Gonell-Cruz, Immaculada Llop-Harillo

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J Carlos Díaz-FernándezDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Construction, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.
Alba Roda-SalesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Construction, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4644-1886
Carlos Gonell-CruzDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Construction, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.ORCID 0009-0005-3975-8307
Immaculada Llop-HarilloDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Construction, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9378-1947

Funding

MICIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PID2020-118021RB-I00MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and "ERDF/EU" PID2024-162755OB-I00Universitat Jaume I UJI-A2022-19; UJI-2024-05; PREDOC/2024/57; GACUJIMA/2025/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prosthetic socket is the essential interface between the residual limb and the prosthesis. However, traditional upper-limb sockets are highly sensitive to residual-limb volume fluctuations and rely on experience-dependent manual fabrication processes. Additive manufacturing and 3D scanning technologies offer the possibility of producing personalized sockets, potentially improving accessibility, repeatability, and cost-effectiveness. Despite this potential, there is still a lack of systematic experimental validation directly comparing the fitting performance of personalized 3D-printed sockets with that of conventionally manufactured sockets. This study presents the design, fabrication, and comparative validation of a personalized 3D-printed upper-limb socket and a traditionally manufactured socket produced for the same user. The 3D-printed socket was developed from a 3D scanning of a clinically rectified plaster mold, computer-aided design, and material extrusion by thermal reaction bonding. A comparative validation framework evaluated both sockets under equivalent conditions, including mechanical testing, thermal behavior assessment, and sensorized fitting measurements. The results provide quantitative evidence on how a personalized 3D-printed socket performs relative to a traditional socket in terms of structural behavior, thermal patterns, and interface-related fitting parameters. This work contributes objective data supporting 3D-printed personalized sockets as a technically feasible and promising alternative to conventional methods.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsPrinting, Three-DimensionalProsthesis DesignProsthesis FittingUpper ExtremityComputer-Aided DesignHumansadditive manufacturingdesignexperimental validationforce sensorspersonalized prostheticsthermal patternsupper-limb socket fitting

Identifiers

PMID42739994
PMCPMC13568377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.