Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42739988›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Two-Tier Anomaly Detection for V2I Alerting on IoT Vehicle Counts: A Kuwait Corridor Benchmark.

Yousef AlSaqabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yousef AlSaqabiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Kuwait University, Kuwait City 72304, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0002-5592-2884

Funding

Kuwait University ZE01/26
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anomaly detection in vehicular networks focuses on cybersecurity, leaving physical traffic-flow anomalies at urban intersections underserved by IoT sensing. This paper benchmarks anomaly detection on five days of hourly vehicle counts from four consecutive signalized intersections in Kuwait City, with a vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) latency feasibility analysis. Anomalies are synthetically injected because verified incident labels are unavailable; scores reflect detectability under the injection protocol rather than validated incident detection. Across ten injection seeds, CUSUM is the most accurate (mean F1 0.945, perfect precision on every seed), Isolation Forest attains the highest recall (0.955), and the LSTM-AE reaches F1 0.347; on misaligned anomaly classes, the margin narrows, and the LSTM-AE matches CUSUM on gradual drift. A corridor rule localizes detected corridor anomalies (9/9, conditional on detection). Hourly aggregation alone imposes an expected 1800 s detection delay, over 130 times the 13.5 s V2I budget at 80 km/h. A sub-second Tier-1 edge detector, evaluated in traffic-calibrated simulation, detects surges within budget (median 6.8 to 9.1 s, robust to signal-cycle platooning), whereas flow-cutoff detection requires roughly 21 s and overnight hours remain a blind spot. Results support a two-tier edge-cloud design and provide, to our knowledge, the first such benchmark on real Gulf-region corridor count data.

Indexed as

CUSUMGulf regioninductive loop sensorsintelligent transportation systemsInternet of ThingsIsolation ForestLSTM autoencodersmart mobilitytraffic anomaly detectionvehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I)

Identifiers

PMID42739988
PMCPMC13568011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.