Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42739973›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Preprocessing Strategies for Animal Behavior Classification Using Inertial Sensors: Effects of Filtering, Normalization, and Data Representation.

Magno do Nascimento Amorim, Késia Oliveira da Silva-Miranda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Magno do Nascimento AmorimDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo (ESALQ/USP), Piracicaba 13418-900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0332-2905
Késia Oliveira da Silva-MirandaDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo (ESALQ/USP), Piracicaba 13418-900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5143-0789

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 140355/2023-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic classification of livestock behaviors, including feeding, rumination, standing, lying, walking, and drinking, using wearable accelerometers has become an important tool in precision livestock farming (PLF). However, the influence of preprocessing strategies on classification performance and computational efficiency remains poorly understood. This study investigated the effects of filtering, normalization, data representation, and machine learning algorithms using five accelerometer datasets comprising 3,533,974 records collected from different livestock species and sampling frequencies. Four filtering strategies, three normalization methods, two data representations, and four machine learning algorithms were evaluated using a standardized pipeline. Model performance was assessed using weighted F1-scores together with statistical and computational analyses. The absence of filtering achieved the highest average performance, reaching a weighted F1-score of 0.773 with Random Forest, whereas high-pass filtering consistently reduced performance (minimum average F1 = 0.605 across sampling frequencies) while increasing computational cost. Z-score standardization improved the performance of scale-sensitive algorithms, increasing SVM performance by up to 8.6% compared with no normalization. Feature-based representations provided greater stability for conventional machine learning models, whereas raw signals generally benefited the 1D-CNN. These findings demonstrate that preprocessing strategies should be selected according to the learning algorithm, signal characteristics, and computational constraints rather than applied as universal procedures, providing methodological guidance for the development of efficient livestock behavior monitoring systems.

Indexed as

AccelerometryBehavior, AnimalAlgorithmsAnimalsClassification AlgorithmsLivestockMachine LearningRandom Forestaccelerometeranimal behaviormachine learningprecision livestock farmingsignal preprocessing

Identifiers

PMID42739973
PMCPMC13568227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.