ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Camera-GPS Sensor Fusion for Kinematic Characterization, Microsimulation Validation, and Macroscopic Capacity Modeling of Traffic-Calming Corridors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a sensor-fused field investigation and simulation-based analysis of four horizontal and vertical traffic-calming devices-two raised speed tables, a speed hump, and a raised crosswalk-installed along a 5250-ft two-lane residential collector in Nashville, TN, USA. A dual-sensor architecture combining a Miovision Scout video-based vehicle counter and WAAS/EGNOS-augmented GPS probe-vehicle logging (5 m 3-D RMS horizontal accuracy, 1 Hz sampling) was used to reconstruct 30 quality-controlled free-flow vehicle trajectories and 12-h per-lane volume counts. A spatial kinematic transform (a = v·dv/dx) was applied to extract device-specific approach-deceleration and post-device recovery-acceleration rates, and a three-parameter log-logistic cumulative-distribution function was fitted to the field-observed desired-speed percentiles (root-mean-square error below 0.043 for both speed-table devices). The camera- and GPS-derived observations were used to calibrate and statistically validate a PTV VISSIM microsimulation replica of the corridor, achieving a mean-speed calibration error of 0.71% or better at every device, a GEH statistic below 1.5 at all four analysis turning movements, and independent travel-time validation errors of 5.7-12.1%, within the accepted 15% threshold. The validated model was then used to reconstruct device- and spacing-specific May-Keller macroscopic speed-density-flow relationships, calibrated against simulated capacities of 650-775 vehicles per hour per lane at 350-, 700-, and 1050-ft device spacing. Results show capacity reductions of 20-33% relative to free-flow conditions and yield kinematically derived maximum recommended spacings of 265-630 ft to maintain crossing speeds at or below 15 mph, depending on device geometry. The findings demonstrate a reproducible, low-cost sensor-fusion workflow for quantifying the safety-capacity trade-off of traffic-calming corridors and for informing the design of sensor-in-the-loop adaptive-calming infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.