ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Training-Free Structural Damage Localization Using Spatial-Correlation Sensor Networks: Full-Scale Validation on a Seven-Story Reinforced-Concrete Building.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Damage identification in instrumented structures is often framed through modal-parameter changes, finite element updating, or supervised classifiers. These approaches are powerful, but they require an explicit structural model, identified modes, labeled damage cases, or expert choices about reference sensors. This paper introduces a new data-driven and training-free approach with limited physical priors, defining a sensor network where each sensor is a node and the edges are defined from the spatial correlation of sensor responses. The idea is to use each sensor time history as the measured structural dynamics feature while damage is localized from the edges, whose correlations change relative to a baseline. The method is demonstrated on a full-scale seven-story reinforced-concrete shear-wall building tested at UC San Diego, considering four progressive earthquake-induced damage states and one brace-modification state. The results are compared with those obtained from a previously published finite element model. The results reveal that this network-based approach localizes the damage states in agreement with previous studies with limited prior requirements and low computational cost. Beyond damage localization, this network representation provides sensor centrality, allowing informative sensors to be selected from data rather than chosen randomly or only from experimental intuitions. For the case study, using this sensor network, we find the most central sensors, those carrying the most information with reduced trial-and-error and reduced expert intervention, and use them to recover the first three natural frequencies as a secondary dynamic check. The results show that spatial correlation networks can screen for damage, localize affected regions, and guide modal parameter extraction without building an FE model. This study opens a research avenue in which network representations of multi-sensor structural dynamics complement traditional modal analysis for structural health monitoring, with dense or heterogeneous sensing systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.