ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Feasibility of Drill-Tip Position Estimation During Cortical Bone Drilling Using Force and Torque Signals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeExcessive drill advancement after cortical breakthrough is a potential safety concern in orthopaedic procedures. We developed a data-driven approach to estimate the drill-tip position relative to the far cortex prior to breakthrough using time-series thrust force and spindle torque signals.
methodsDrilling experiments were performed on 268 porcine cortical bone specimens at a constant feed rate of 0.5 mm/s. A long short-term memory network was trained to estimate the drill-tip position from filtered force and torque signals. The reference position was derived from breakthrough timing confirmed by high-speed imaging and the programmed feed rate. Performance was evaluated using mean absolute error within the -2 to +2 mm peri-breakthrough interval. Two post hoc analyses examined whether model performance exceeded an elapsed-time baseline and whether pre-breakthrough force patterns were more consistent when expressed relative to breakthrough position than to drilling onset time.
resultsThe combined-input LSTM achieved an MAE of 0.20 mm, compared with 0.23 mm for force alone and 0.24 mm for torque alone. Among the representative architectures evaluated, LSTM showed the lowest regression error. A signal-blind time-only baseline yielded an MAE of 0.54 mm. The association between cortical thickness and force-decline onset was weaker when expressed in spatial coordinates relative to breakthrough than when expressed as time from drilling onset (R
conclusionConverting sensor-derived resistance patterns into spatially anchored positional information may support proactive strategies such as controlled deceleration before penetration. The proposed approach represents a step toward exemplifying the emerging concept of surgeon-assisting Physical AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.