ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Airway Clearance and Pediatric Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: A Clinical Framework for Children and Adolescents.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is an inherited motile-cilia disorder. Impaired mucociliary transport promotes persistent secretion retention, infection, inflammation, and bronchiectasis. The central treatment problem is therefore failure of airway clearance rather than infection alone. This narrative review evaluates airway clearance techniques (ACTs), mucoactive adjuncts, and pulmonary rehabilitation for children and adolescents. We prioritize direct pediatric PCD evidence, identify mixed-age or adult PCD findings as population-bound PCD evidence, and label pediatric bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis evidence as indirect. Because no ACT has been shown to be universally superior and pediatric rehabilitation evidence remains limited, we present an author-proposed clearance-anchored dual-pillar framework. ACTs directly address mucus retention. Pulmonary rehabilitation complements ACT by targeting fitness, muscle performance, participation, and self-management. Response should be assessed across four domains: clinical stability, treatment performance, physiological and functional outcomes, and patient and family experience. Prospective multicenter comparative trials and harmonized pediatric outcome measures are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.