ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2026
Radiological Response to Capecitabine and Temozolomide in an Elderly Patient with Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is characterized by limited treatment options beyond first-line therapy, and cross-resistance among cytotoxic agents is often assumed to exist. However, differential sensitivity to distinct chemotherapy mechanisms may exist. We report the case of an 81-year-old woman diagnosed with metastatic LMS of unknown primary origin presenting with extensive hepatic and pulmonary involvement. Following eight cycles of first-line gemcitabine plus docetaxel, the patient achieved stable disease without objective tumor shrinkage. Given this limited response, a significant radiological response to subsequent therapy was not anticipated. Second-line oral capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) was initiated, resulting in a marked radiologic regression at four months, with reductions in hepatic metastases and pulmonary nodules and no new lesions. Treatment was well tolerated, with no grade 3-4 toxicities. This case demonstrates a differential response to gemcitabine-based therapy and sensitivity to alkylating agents in LMS, supporting a more individualized, mechanism-driven treatment sequencing approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.