ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Soluble CLEC-2 as an Emerging Biomarker of In Vivo Platelet Activation.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Platelet activation plays a central role in arterial thrombosis, thromboinflammation, and microvascular injury. Conventional platelet function tests evaluate platelet responsiveness to exogenous agonists ex vivo but do not directly reflect in vivo platelet activation. Although several soluble platelet-derived molecules, including platelet factor 4 (PF4), β-thromboglobulin (β-TG), soluble P-selectin, soluble CD40 ligand, glycocalicin, and soluble glycoprotein (GP) VI, have been investigated as in vivo platelet activation markers, their clinical use is limited by preanalytical instability, lack of platelet specificity, constitutive shedding, or uncertain disease specificity. Soluble C-type lectin-like receptor 2 (sCLEC-2) has recently emerged as a promising biomarker of in vivo platelet activation. CLEC-2 is expressed predominantly in platelets and megakaryocytes, and its soluble form is released from activated platelets as both a shed molecule and a microparticle-associated form. Compared with PF4 and β-TG, sCLEC-2 is less susceptible to artifactual release during routine blood collection, making it more suitable for clinical laboratory testing. Elevated sCLEC-2 levels have been reported in acute coronary syndrome, acute ischemic stroke, disseminated intravascular coagulation, thrombotic microangiopathy, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In thrombocytopenic disorders, indices incorporating platelet count, such as the C2PAC index, sCLEC-2/D-dimer ratio, and sCLEC-2 × D-dimer/platelet count, may better reflect platelet activation and disease status than sCLEC-2 concentration alone. However, preanalytical standardization, assay harmonization, reference interval validation, and disease-specific cutoff values remain essential. This review summarizes the biological basis, assay systems, clinical evidence, and future perspectives of sCLEC-2 as an emerging laboratory marker of in vivo platelet activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.