Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42739427›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Cucurbitacins in Plant-Insect Interactions: Biosynthesis, Regulation, Ecological Functions, and Prospects for Crop Protection.

Qi Zhang, Yu-E Bai, Aoga Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qi ZhangCollege of Forestry, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.ORCID 0009-0004-4748-9437
Yu-E BaiCollege of Forestry, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Aoga LiCollege of Forestry, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia, grant number 2026QC0549. 2026QC0549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cucurbitacins are highly oxygenated tetracyclic triterpenoids characterized by intense bitterness, substantial structural diversity, and important consequences for plant-herbivore interactions. Although best known from Cucurbitaceae, cucurbitacins and related cucurbitane-type metabolites also occur in phylogenetically distant herbaceous and woody plants. Genetic and biochemical studies have validated several core biosynthetic steps, including cucurbitadienol formation by oxidosqualene cyclases and subsequent modification by cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, acyltransferases, and glycosyltransferases. Tissue-preferential basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors constitute the best-characterized regulatory layer, whereas the evidence supporting accessory regulators, transporters, and environmental responses varies from functional validation to transcriptomic or genomic prediction. From the plant perspective, cucurbitacins deter feeding or impair performance in many generalist and non-adapted herbivores. By contrast, their use as host-recognition cues and feeding stimulants by specialist diabroticite beetles reflects evolved herbivore adaptations involving perception, tolerance, metabolism, or sequestration rather than a second defensive function of the plant trait. Herbivore-induced cucurbitacin accumulation has been demonstrated in particular systems, although its regulatory mechanisms and ecological generality remain unresolved. Unlike previous reviews centered primarily on cucurbitacin chemistry, pharmacological activity, or individual biosynthetic pathways, this review integrates evidence-graded pathway reconstruction and molecular regulation with taxonomic distribution, insect adaptation, domestication, and agroecological consequences. Mechanistically, this review traces how scaffold formation, oxidative tailoring, conjugation, tissue-specific regulation, and transport give rise to contrasting ecological outcomes through herbivore-specific perception, tolerance, metabolism, and sequestration. We conclude that uniformly increasing or eliminating cucurbitacins is unlikely to provide broadly effective crop resistance because either direction may favor a different herbivore group. Future priorities include functional validation of candidate genes, spatially resolved metabolite analysis, comparative investigation of non-cucurbit lineages, and field evaluation involving generalist and specialist herbivores, crop quality, and non-target organisms. These advances will support context-specific fruit-quality improvement, behavioral pest control, and integrated pest management strategies rather than cucurbitacin manipulation as a stand-alone resistance approach.

Indexed as

agroecologychemical defensecrop domesticationcucurbitacinsherbivore adaptationintegrated pest managementmolecular regulationtriterpenoid biosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID42739427
PMCPMC13567581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.